Pages

Friday, February 26, 2021

#9 Blog Post

 REACTION TO :

FRONTLINE THE FACEBOOK DILEMMA


February 26 , 2021
by Julianna Rigoglioso 

After watching Frontline The Facebook Dilemma, I couldn't help but reminisce on how I first joined the Facebook social media platform myself. When I was about ten years old, my mom and manager created a separate Facebook page for myself in which they posted and monitored for me. I am an actress, so my management and agents suggested for me to become more active on social media. Nonetheless, at the time, the new "Facebook Fan Page" feature was a great way to start. My mom and I took pictures and posted together about different Broadway/off-Broadway shows I was in at the time, where I was performing on tour, backstage photos with fans, movie and television premieres, and more. It wasn't anything crazy, nor did I go on it every day. That account was eventually shut down; my mom and I gave up and I was more into managing my own social media as I hit my pre-teens. This was when I became interested in Instagram and Twitter. I didn't create my own Facebook profile until 2019! I realized that there were various Facebook groups for incoming freshmen at colleges I was interested in attending. I used Facebook to connect with my future classmates and peers! 


It is because of Facebook that social media has evolved into a creation so advanced, interactive, important—yet dangerous. The key to audience engagement is finding and displaying information that suits them; personalized ads, news, tweets, pictures. Facebook created and used algorithms to find this information from user's data, keeping them intrigued. 10 years ago, we did not notice these things; society was more concerned about their Facebook post for that day. Throughout the years, we as a society, however, have become more aware of social media companies, like Facebook, and how they unethically operate their business. Companies thrive off of storing, purchasing, and selling personal data. They use their creations to over-step into our personal lives—without users even knowing it.




After viewing Frontline The Facebook Dilemma, boy do I wish I never joined the app as a young girl. To think that my personal searches and data were/are being tracked, stored, and sold, is very unsettling. I am not surprised, however. If I shop for clothes online early in the day and browse news feeds later that night, ads for that brand, or similar brands, will pop up on the site—I notice this happens daily. I try to clear my cookies and search engine weekly to remove my search data from these websites. Facebook users are treated as pixels: this is just so unethical. The documentary highlights the issue that after Facebook partnered with brokersdata is collected and sold: more importantly, our private data is being sold—let that sink in. 

Thursday, February 25, 2021

#8 Blog Post


DIFFUSION OF INNOVATIONS

February 21, 2021
by Julianna Rigoglioso


The Diffusion of Innovation Theory was developed by E.M Rodgers in 1962. The theory explains how over time, an idea or product will gain popularity, momentum, and then will spread, or diffuse, through a specific population system. This results in society adopting a new idea or belief: out with the old and in with the new. We become more advanced, especially with our friend, technology. Technological innovations are the key to adoption. People want the newest gadget with the best features. 


Let's take a look at the innovation of the iPhone through the lens of diffusion theory. 

Steve Jobs created the iPhone and it hit the market in 2007. This handheld computer screen transformed the "mobile phone business, internet economy, and society as a whole. " Steve Jobs created a touch screen mobile device that could make calls and texts while also featuring internet browsing use. In 2021, there are more than 113 million iPhone users in the United States, accounting for about 47% of all smartphone users. And certainly, this number continues to grow each year. The iPhone caught on to society and went widespread due to its convenience and innovative features. 

Steve Jobs introduces iPhone in 2007


One positive consequence of the creation of the iPhone was that sparked a dramatic change in the economy. Technology and phone companies now try to create their own version of the smartphone to compete with Apple's iPhone. As a result, in 2021, technology businesses are thriving and one of the top money-making industries in the world. Because tech is in such high demand, companies continue to produce more products to gain higher revenue. Companies launch newer and more advanced features each year drawing in the public eye. Now, if all companies compete against each other in a race to wealth and popularity, this ultimately results in better, faster, and more advanced gadgets for society. In 2017, Apple launched its most innovative feature for the iPhone allowing users to unlock their phones using facial recognition. The iPhone outshines all smartphones and Apple has projected the theme that with the advancement of their products, the possibilities are endless. The beautiful design, along with the excellent performance, and high-quality software of the device mesmerizes users. The power it holds over the public is insane. Now, this brings me to the negative consequence of the device.

The public's obsession with the iPhone stems from how convenient it makes completing most professional and personal tasks. Nonetheless, we as a society are becoming more reliant on the device. Now I believe things in moderation are fine. Although, staring at a screen for hours and hours a day simply isn't the best way to treat your brain. Studies have shown that too much screen time can lead to retina damage and even sleep deprivation. 

This is the main reason why some people choose to not adopt this new version of the cell phone. They witnessed their children slowly becoming more and more addicted to the device and didn't want the same thing to happen to them, especially as an adult. As for late adopters, like my parents, they waited long before purchasing their first iPhone because they didn't see the need for it, nor did they want to become reliant on it either. My dad enjoys keeping his files in Manila folders, responding to emails from his work computer, and reading news from the paper each morning. He says that "I don't like to mix work and play, I'll get too used to it. My phone is strictly used as a cellular device." He has a point, the iPhone merges all aspects of our lives into one device–hence its convenience. Additionally, late adopters— and those who chose not to adopt it at all—were more concerned about how it was too advanced for their knowledge. Nonetheless, Gen Z and Millenials were the early adopters in which they were quick to purchase the device as soon as it hit the market because they understood the concept of technology through the use of computers. After all, isn't the iPhone just a smaller version of the computer that can make calls and texts? For someone who isn't technologically savvy, adopting this innovative piece could cause more stress than just sticking with their blackberry or flip phone. 

iPhone's ultimately acted as a vehicle to the innovation of social media platforms as well—which is a positive consequence... right? This again, resulting in more companies, businesses, and industries earning an even higher revenue, which is great for the economy. Nonetheless, because these devices are addicting to society, private social media companies, like Facebook, abuse this concept to their advantage. Facebook sells and stores our personal data on our iPhones; acting as if we human beings are computer codes. 

Now, do you like your iPhone? Do you like having everything you need on one screen, all in one place? Documents, pictures, the internet, contacts, conversations all on your small, 6-inch screen. However, do you like how private tech companies have all your information: passwords, search engine data, pictures, fingerprints, facial recognition? Do you feel like you are monitored on social media through your iPhone? This is the ultimate downside to these technological advances and innovations: the lack of privacy and ethics. 





References: 





Wednesday, February 17, 2021

#7 BLOG POST

EOTO: 

N  E  T  F  L  I  X

 February 17th, 2021
 by Julianna Rigoglioso

In the 21st century, Live Television has taken the backseat to Online Streaming Services. Society said goodbye to waiting weeks before you can watch the next episode of your TV Show. Everyone's favorite television shows and movies are now in one place and accessible at any time; as long as you pay the $15 a month of course. Online streaming services have taken over the world— and you can thank Netflix for that. Netflix started this wave that society continues to surf.

Founded in 1997, Netflix has adapted and innovated the world of watching: the entertainment industry has forever been changed. And it is because of this that it will still continue to adapt as we become more technologically savvy. First beginning as a DVD rental company, Netflix has become almost everyone's obsession in today's society in 2021. Before becoming the ultimate "go-to" streaming service, Netflix first gained popularity by selling DVDs to people online. 

You would pick out movies from Netflix's website and wait for the movies to deliver to you at your door; similar to online shopping. Customers typically rented it for a monthly fee for as many movies as they wish. The number of DVDs in their possession at any one time was not always available depending on certain subscriptions. The movie catalogs were limited.

In 2021, the movie catalogs and selctions are endless. With less than 10 clicks of my remote, I can entertain my brain for hours on end. And once I am done with one movie, I can move on to the next within minutes. 

After Netflix hit the web; Hulu and Amazon Prime were later created. Evidently, Netflix created a pathway that many entertainment companies now follow—Hulu was created in 2008, Amazon Prime in 2006. Society loves television and now, with such advanced devices to watch these shows on, Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime have all become billion-dollar companies. Even Disney followed in Netflix's footsteps; finally creating their own streaming service in 2019 for all Disney classic movies and shows. 


Netflix ultimately created the avenue of innovation for streaming services. It is now a race to see which company can add the coolest features and best movies to their platform. Great for society, big tech/entertainment company competition leads to new and more advanced features for us movie watchers. For example, to amp their streaming service, Netflix began creating their own content. In 2012, Netflix decided to make their own TV Shows and Movies to add to their website; titled Netflix Originals. 

Some argue that Netflix ruins TV for people because it is so easily accessible now. You can binge-watch any show at any time. Its convenience ruins the suspense you would have to endure while waiting for next week's episode for your favorite TV show.  Netflix, and other streaming services, are also slowly taking people away from going to the movies. Especially now with the pandemic, no one is going out, let alone going to the movie theatre. Who knows if they will ever open back up again? Like I mentioned in my introduction, Live Television and movies have taken the backseat to Online Streaming Services like Netflix.


References:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/blakemorgan/2019/02/19/what-is-the-netflix-effect/?sh=16a1bdaf5640

https://ted2srt.org/talks/reed_hastings_how_netflix_changed_entertainment_and_where_it_s_headed

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Netflix-Inc


Friday, February 5, 2021

#6 KEY POST

  

Innovation of HEADPHONES

                (Feb. 5. 2021): 
           by Julianna Rigoglioso

TIMELINE

1881: Used by telephone operators
1885: Electrophone SystemListen to Local Opera Houses 
1910: Nathaniel Baldwin manufactured first modern headphones
1937: the "DT-48's" from Beyerdynamic 
1949: AKG produced their first pair of headphones called the "K120'S"
1958: John C. Koss invented first pair of stereoheadphones "(Koss SP-3)" 
1959: Stax debuted first electrostatic pair of headphones 
1960: "SR-1's" went into production
1968: Koss released first US electrostatic model headphones "ESP-6's" (weighing 2lbs)
1979: SONY: "The Walkman" (First Portable Headphones: MDL-3L2 headphones came with the purchase of the first Walkman) 
1980: Earbud and in-ear headphone became popular 
1997: SONY Neckband headphones
2000: BOSE "QuietComfort" (noise cancelling technology)
2001: "The IPod" created by Apple

2008:
 Dr. Dre, Jimmy Lovine, Monster created
"Beats by Dre" headphones popular to athletes especially NBA All Stars
2012: The style of headphones : Beats are seen as trendy and luxurious 
2016: Wireless headphones (Apple, Bose)
2020: Noise Canceling wireless headphones (Apple, Bose)


What Do You Use to Listen to Music?
Do you own a pair of headphones? Are they noise canceling? Do you use earbuds with a string? Do you use wireless ear-buds produced by Apple or Bose? Have you purchased Apple's newest noise-canceling AirPods? 

In 2021, the options and colorways are endless when deciding on what headphones to purchase. Companies produce headphones for various reasons such as sleep help, editing movies, listening to music, studying, working out. Have you ever wondered what life would be like if we didn't have headphones? No more Justin Bieber blasting in your ear on the walk to class...No more listening to music on the beach, while studying for an exam, or even warming up before a big playoff game. Before the first pair of headphones were created in the 1880s, life was quite different without this piece of technology; and when they were created, however, they were not nearly as advanced and trendy as they are now.

Until the late 19th century, the earliest of headphones had nothing to do with music; instead, they were used for radio communication and telephone operators. First created in the early 1890s by a British company called Electrophone, headphones first made their mark on the world as a "single earpiece that rested on the user's shoulder and weighed over 10 pounds"  Next, in 1885, families could listen to the local opera houses nearby through a large metal piece that kind of looks like a stethoscope. Those who could afford it would subscribe and enjoy the music from their local opera house—giving signals and providing music—miles away. Moving later into 1910, Nathaniel Baldwin created the first-ever modern headphones from his very own kitchen and sold them to the US Navy. Almost 30 years later, in 1927, the "DT-48's" from Beyerdynamic became were the first headphones ever to hit the market. This product sparked the innovation of headphones. AKG followed and produced in 1949 the "K120's": their first pair of headphones. Ultimately, in 1958, the game changed when John C. Koss created the first pair of stereo headphones (Koss SP-3). He developed an entire private listening system for enjoying music by plugging in your headphones to your stereo.

After 1958, the revolution of headphones began. 
 
We can thank the Sony Walkman, which was on the market in 1979, for headphones' popularity and success. The Sony Walkman was the first ever portable music player. Listening to music was now something you could do from anywhere. This changed the game; people now incorporate music into their daily lives because it is more accessible than ever before. Companies cater toward the average person and what their day consists of. From 1980-1997, the headphones' main concern was the comfort and weight of the product. Companies now try to design a product that people could use to work out in or do other tasks without the weight of bulky headphones on top of their head; the solution: earbuds and neckband headphones.

Generally speaking, the innovation of headphones is remarkable. I find it crazy how something can change and improve so dramatically over time. Headphones originally were used by telephone operators. The headphones were large, heavy, and the audio was mediocre; the practicality was not near where it is today. When you think about the innovation of headphones from 1880 to 2021, the product literally shrank and multiplied: everyone has a pair now. Now, in the 21st century, headphones have been innovated and adapted into a piece of technology smaller than a person's ear, with quality better than ever before. Almost everyone has a pair of headphones or earbuds: especially now as we live in an era of such technological reliance. According to countless surverys, Derek Thompson, from The Atlantic, reports "with confidence, that music makes us happier, better at concentrating, and more productive." (2012). Today, people rely on their headphones for studying and concentration purposes. Even athletes rely on their music and headphones to play their "Pump Up" playlist before their big game to get them in the right mind set. In 2020 and now 2021, people rely on headphones to listen to their online classes and watch lectures. 

Headphones also caused a change in people's mental health and how they cope with their emotions. After portable headphones hit the market, listening to music became a private thing: a thing that only you could hear. It allowed people to escape their daily lives and tune into a song, listen to the lyrics, and be in their own world: music therapy

The revolution of headphones impacted the growth and innovation of various new technologies. Without the invention of headphones, portable music devices, like IPods, wouldn't have been invented. Headphones also impacted the music, film, and entertainment industry as well. They allow people to listen to whatever, wherever. More people were listening to music; therefore, more artists were releasing music. 
After the internet became more popular, users would put on their headphones and listen to their sound privately. With the birth of Netflix, YouTube, and other streaming platforms, headphones and sound companies were determined to up their product. 


In 2021, almost everyone owns a pair of headphones or earbuds. In college, I used my earbuds every day: listening to music on my walk to class, while studying, when I am at the gym. Whether I am in an online lecture or on vacation on the beach, my headphones are always with me. Are yours? 














Monday, February 1, 2021

#5 KEY POST

 Thoughts on the Eight Values of Free Expression

(Feb. 1. 2021): by Julianna Rigoglioso


Eight Values of Free Expression

1. Market Place of Ideas

2. Participation in Self- Government

3. Stable Change

4. Individual Self fufillment

5. Check on Governmental Power

6. Promote Tolerance

7. Promote Innovation

8. Protect Dissent


Within The Eight Values of Free Expression, I find that number six, Promote Tolerance, is found evident in our daily lives. In this value, Lee Bollinger emphasizes Freedom of Speech and Extremist Speech. He mentions that Hate Speech will ultimately lead to a more tolerant society. We cannot silence others or their opinions because this would be violating the 1st Amendment. We cannot add our emotions when speaking about the first amendment; as citizens of the United States, we are entitled to our freedom of speech and opinion. When using hate speech, society itself will punish because there are certain norms that are created, certain mannerisms, and morals. 

If someone posts a racist or prejudice slur online, the majority of the media and viewers will go after that person for their statement. That person most likely will have a difficult time seeking employment, especially in a prestigious field or with a profitable company. Very few people will respect that person and even with a simple apology, it will not cut it. I have seen this type of online punishment countless times. With social media, users have to be mindful of what they post. After all, it could come back years later and haunt them; especially celebrities, political figures, athletes, CEOS, any kind of person who has made their mark on the world. Because these individuals hold such a title, they are viewed in a different light than the average American citizen. However, this could all come crashing down if one said, did, or supported something that is seen as unjust. 

Simply, we do not need to throw people in jail when they say something we don't like: this is what I mean by we can't include our emotions when referring to the First Amendment. More importantly, this is what Bollinger stresses: promoting tolerance. As a society, we have progressed so much that society itself will give out the punishment. Punishments such as social harassment online—make what you said go viral so that your known and judged simply by your one post. Because the person has failed to accept progressivism and violated society's standards of right and wrong, the media will punish them by stopping that specific individual's own progress in their life. 

We have seen this with cancel culture; celebrities' old videos, posts, and tweets coming back to haunt them. Now instead of throwing those in jail, let's take a look at how the media punishes those who violate society's morals using hate speech. This is how society promotes tolerance. 


Shane Dawson CANCELED  

Shane Dawson's Apology Video:
Taking Accountability
Posted on June 26, 2020
Shane Dawson, a 32-year-old famous Youtuber, gets canceled by the media after the circulation of his old posts from when he was in his twenties. Dawson created videos and performed "comedic" skits. In one of his skits, he imitates a black person while wearing blackface. In other videos, he has imitated Mexican people, mocking their stereotype. 

About 10 years later, his old posts (he thought were gone) circulate back to trending in the year 2020. He faces the backlash of the media. He says in his apology video (2020), that "I have done a lot of bad things in the past that I hate, that I wish could go away, that I tried to make go away by deleting videos, or untagging my Instagram, literally doing whatever I can to pretend those things didn't happen," he said. 

In his video (linked to the side), he apologizes for "all the racism [he] put out on the internet as an adult, not a child," he emphasizes. He was twenty years old when he posted these skits where he plays the stereotypes of Black people, Asian people, and Mexican people: "or pretty much every race," he adds. Aside from his offensive videos mocking different races, he also was called out for joking about pedophilia. In Dawson's defense, he made the claim that he had trauma, issues with his family as a child, and never was taken to therapy until he was an adult. He "took that pain, and turned it into jokes," says Dawson. He admits that this kind of behavior is disgusting and something he is ashamed of. 

Now, it is hard for the media and the public—myself included—to ultimately just accept his apology: it will take a lot of time and healing. Months later, in 2021, Dawson has still not used his social platform. Will he ever try to restart his career again? Only time will tell. 

Now, I am not saying that what Dawson did or said was right or okay--it definitely was not and I would never support or follow his actions. I will, however, listen to his apology, and not completely label him as a racist or pedophile. I simply don't know, I have never met the man. However, he has had years of fame, and fortune, and hasn't been labeled racist until 2020—when people brought up his old content. I think that the times back then were different, the media and people were as educated as they are now. As time goes on, society's values, morals, and tolerance adapt as well. More people speak up, speak out against what is right and wrong, and society learns. In 2019, he had 23.1 Million subscribers and countless brand deals. After the scandal in 2020, he lost at least 700,000 subscribers. In my opinion, society treated content like this (and this subject of controversy) differently than 10 years ago.

Now, relating back to Promoting Tolerance, society creates its own kind of public punishment; the government does not have the right to throw Dawson in jail for his stupidity and offensiveness. Dawson is not a criminal, but he is considered a disrespectful human being. People who use hate speech can and will get punished without it being a federal arrest or charge. Look at Dawson, he lost brand deals, his fans and followers, probably his friends, and ultimately his monthly income. 

Hate speech is an opinion, not a fact. There isn't a set of rules stating what is hurtful to others and what is not. However, it is the individual's job to learn, accept, and educate themselves on what is offensive to certain religions, races, cultures, and chose to respect that. After all, that is what a good and honorable person would do.